North Korea Calls for Peace Treaty Talks With U.S.
Summary: This piece of news focuses on the issue that North Korea tries to initiate negotiations with the United Nations to replace the truce with a new peace treaty, which could lead to the dismantling of it nuclear programs. Its foreign ministry states that such an accord would relieve the tension between North Korea and the U.S, furthermore, it will accelerates its process of denuclearization. However, scholars and politicians from the U.S and South Korea are under the view that it was a manoeuvre played by North Korea to help them win more time for nuclear development. In history, peace talks on such issues have been held but all ended up with failure. Currently, Mr. Obama’s envoy states that the distortion of human rights also hindered the process of such peace proposals.
Reflection:
Firstly, in terms of language, this news clearly demonstrates the issue with the aid of technical terms and jargons, such as denuclearization, normalize.
Secondly, the article includes an introduction that familiarizes readers with the background of the news; nevertheless, it does not have a clear ending.
Last by not the least, several remarks from both sides have been quoted to enrich the article, the combination of voices from both sides help make the content of the news unbiased.
Response to the content:
I do believe that peace and development are the mainstream of the world nowadays. According to IAEA(International Atomic Energy Agency), every country has the right to develop nuclear technology for civiain use. However, the abuse of such right could bring about proliferation and nuclear arms competition, which will stir the stability of the region and pose a menace to the security of adjacent countries. This is the reason why the U.N imposed sanction on DPRK for its aggressive nuclear programs.
In my opinion, it’s not judicious for leaders of DPRK to proceed to sacrifice domestic economy only to achieve the ownership of nuclear arms. It’s not feasible for such country to develop nuclear weapons within a short period, especially under the great pressure exerted by the U.N., since the sanction imposed on DPRK will impair its economy and impede its further development. Thus, the government should pay more attention on promoting its international relationship and welfare of citizens instead.
Furthermore, superpowers that involve in this issue, including the U.S. and China, should take the responsibility to handle the problem. The peace proposal sent by DPRK just now could be a turning point of the problem. It provides a good opportunity for both sides to sit together and discuss seriously before too late.
Reference
Sang-Hun, C(11st Jan, 2010). North Korea Calls for Peace Treaty Talks With U.S. Retrieved on 11st Jan, 2010, from http://www.nytimes.com/2010/01/12/world/asia/12korea.html?ref=world
The summary is well-done and readers can get to know the important points of the news from Wayne's summary.
ReplyDeleteThe reflection part mainly focuses on language use and structure of this piece of news. This is something I forgot to mention in my own reflection part and it is very important.
For the response to the content part, Wayne's opinions are quite reasonable. He stated his own opinion towards this issue with clear structure and wise word usage.
However, I do not fully agree with what he has stated in the last paragraph. He could look into this issue deeper instead of saying something general. Furthermore, it would be better if he could give us some statistics to support his ideas. Some uses like "such country" and "too late" are not detailed and well-supported.
Generally, the work done by Wayne is quite good except some small points to be improved.
------------Phyllis